tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4904219782540965444.post7820002252964060031..comments2024-03-14T04:06:54.124-04:00Comments on GENKAKU-AGAIN (adam fisher): october column ... debate fraudgenkakuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12135705172119950326noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4904219782540965444.post-87209014945811307032016-10-19T19:04:58.701-04:002016-10-19T19:04:58.701-04:00Thank you, Adam. Your thoughtful pieces are always...Thank you, Adam. Your thoughtful pieces are always good medicine for me. I do look forward to them.mbrnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4904219782540965444.post-51536253065898653662016-10-19T10:01:28.981-04:002016-10-19T10:01:28.981-04:00I can block pornography with firewalls. I can prev...I can block pornography with firewalls. I can prevent nudity with clothings. Can I prevent human beings from being born naked and nude? Sure I can, by practising continence till the other extent of folks that use contraceptives.<br /><br />Meditating on the subject of my excrement such as urine and faeces, the human body is repulsive and not to be clung to. Meditating on the subject of my breath, I am thankful each day I am alive, even if it is for nothing in partiular. Meditating on the Buddha, I see clearly that my apparent human existence is stressful, transient and without a fixed entity known as a self. Each night that I get to sleep well, good. Each day that my bodily processes function adequately, thanks. Each meal that I have enough food, it is all made possible by the mother earth too. Each saliva and drop of blood that still makes up this life, is because of water. Worldly existence is thirsty, while the dharma is like the water, it quenches thirst.<br /><br />Namo Buddhaya.<br />Namo Dharmaya.<br />Namo Sanghaya.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4904219782540965444.post-35835852892422271132016-10-19T09:39:05.092-04:002016-10-19T09:39:05.092-04:00In 1984 Geraldine Ferraro debated George H. W. Bus...In 1984 Geraldine Ferraro debated George H. W. Bush for the vice presidency. She trotted out facts that defined conditions in foreign and domestic arenas and expressed detailed policy plans. Bush on the other hand preened and posed with all of the ideological evasion of a creationist museum. And at the end, David Brinkley said, as if there were a gun to his head, "Bush won, there... it had to be said". It was embarrassing.<br />olcharliehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00309255390011851502noreply@blogger.com