tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4904219782540965444.post9169767059398633454..comments2024-03-14T04:06:54.124-04:00Comments on GENKAKU-AGAIN (adam fisher): just the facts ma'amgenkakuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12135705172119950326noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4904219782540965444.post-89419317889430108022009-06-23T21:37:20.470-04:002009-06-23T21:37:20.470-04:00Emotional editorializing, as I call it, does make ...Emotional editorializing, as I call it, does make it difficult to sort content from the newsreader's (or the corporate interest's) interpretation. It is something I also find a little irksome in a newscast. It seemed to start really creeping in about 10 years ago that I noticed with many newscasts increasingly focusing on the "human interest" story. Which means soft focus kind of maudlin and cutesy items.And then it spread. I prefer facts too but don't always stick to them.NellaLouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07247769132258539996noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4904219782540965444.post-44517824610718962562009-06-23T11:34:13.713-04:002009-06-23T11:34:13.713-04:00Bravo! The weather channel is my favorite for sens...Bravo! The weather channel is my favorite for sensationalism and faux empathy. To their credit though, they do send reporters now and again into the thick of it.vapid babblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10260357472356140575noreply@blogger.com