Monday, October 12, 2015

entitlement

Of all the things that frighten me, perhaps the most sharp-edged is the enfolding notion that I might somehow be entitled to one thing or another. Former U.S. President George Bush was once described by a detractor as a man "who was born on third base and imagined he had hit a triple." Ouch! ... only I doubt he sees things that way.

Entitlement is such an alluring realm, not least when those in the neighborhood feel likewise entitled or are compelled by blindness to do a lot of insouciant damage before they are willing to look in the mirror ... if they ever do.

But the realm of entitlement has a mirror image as well -- the realm in which the owner is somehow not entitled ... to looks or wealth or power or station or intelligence or ownership or whatever. These are people, sometimes, who imagine that if they give away their worldly goods and simplify their lives and shuffle abjectly from here to there that they can somehow escape the scourge of entitlement.

The one side of the coin is not so very different from the other. Just because you own something doesn't mean you own it. But just because you don't own it doesn't mean you are free from it either. And it is no good trying to morally man-handle the situation into compliance -- to recognize the presumptuousness of ownership and thus elude its lash.

The best I can figure is that paying attention is best. Paying attention allows things to come and go in their time and does not insist. Paying attention means that a "forever postage stamp" will be forever for a while, perhaps, but it's not as if it will be forever. Paying attention means doing less harm, though there is no absolute exemption in which to bask and loll.

These days, there is a social undercurrent that suggests "I am entitled to my opinion," but the important question remains unaddressed and unanswered: "Who says so?"

Sunday, October 11, 2015

dreamy

Passed along in email



if we agree, it must be true

PHOENIX (AP) -- About 200 protesters gathered in front of a mosque Saturday afternoon to demonstrate against Islam as part of a nationwide campaign that went largely unheeded.
Agreement as a yardstick for truth is as dubious as it is popular.

Saturday, October 10, 2015

playing the ukele while driving

And you thought you had problems.

In a letter to "Dear Abby," a woman concerned about her husband's habit of sitting around naked in their semi-private subdivision has likewise found cause for concern in the fact that deputies have stopped by to curtail his playing the ukelele while driving.

Naked strikes me as a minor matter, but a ukelele?!

innocent moments

Soaking up the alpha waves of a local public broadcast TV show last night, I found myself somehow sucked without rejoinder into a realm of what I can only think of as "innocence." The show spliced together bits and pieces of home movies taken during the middle to late 1950's. And there were intermittent comments by those who had lived through those times and still lived. Their comments were often attended with rueful or wishful smiles: They seemed to long for a return to such times and yet now were too savvy not to doubt them.

No questions, no doubts filled my mind for a few minutes. Innocence is so ... innocent.

The film clips showed family gatherings, guys in ties, women in crinolines and impossibly pointy brassieres and curlers to sleep with through the night. There was the growth of suburbia and the wonder of a television set around which families would gather. Guys liked cars. Girls bought clothes. Downtown Springfield, the Massachusetts community in focus, was awash in one shop next to another next to another on Main Street. Malls were not yet. The houses in suburbia were much the same, one to the next. Home films were filled with obligatory and perhaps real laughter and small bits of swing-on-the-swing fun. Everyone was incredibly clean and, mostly, white.

I let it all slide by on the television and was touched by the innocence: It was as if with a child: Don't ask if it is false -- enjoy the truth of this true truth. World War II and its wracking sorrows was in the rearview mirror ... this was neat and clean and relaxing. There were bad girls who went "all the way" and good girls who didn't. Who would not nest and rest and polish hub caps after the muck and mire and loss of a terrible war?

For a few minutes, I made no contrasts and asked no questions. I could feel it all and enjoy what it was and felt blessed to be innocent. Time enough to acknowledge blind spots and idiocies. The sweetness, for a few minutes, was sweet and touching and utterly human.

For a few minutes ... hug the child and then let him go.

Friday, October 9, 2015

tuk-tuk couture

A design inspired by the iconic tuk-tuk, a three-wheeler auto rickshaw, will be used as Thailand’s national costume at the Miss Universe 2015 pageant in December in the United States.
The winning design, Tuk-tuk Thailand, was chosen from 356 entries and was created by Hirankrit Pattaraboriboonkul, 35, an official at the Culture Ministry.
Somehow I hear a Greek chorus of flouncing fashion geeks crooning in the background, "How utterly charming!"

genealogy, gizzards and chicken farts

My sister and a couple of cousins are fans of genealogy -- the collecting of data on those who came before and eventually spat out something called "me." And it is sort of neat, knowing there was a pirate or some juicy character back in the way-back. But my interest is sort of in the same ballpark as an interest in sports or comic books ... it's fun, but in the end there is not much "there" there, at least for me.

What I miss in genealogical collations is the person-dom of the one whose deeds and employment and offspring and dwelling place may go under the microscope. What made this person laugh? Did s/he fart under the covers? Who was his or her best friend? What was the worse betrayal ever faced? What secrets did s/he keep? What contradictions -- some of them wracking -- did s/he exercise every day? Did s/he memorize poetry and if so why? What made him/her soar?

Obviously I am asking impossible questions, but I can't help asking them. I like juicy and warming and horrifying in ways that inspire me to think, "me too" or "get thee behind me, Satan!" If it cannot be done in the present, there's no reason to expect it to be possible in the past.

Still, I am skeptical of knowing about a person just because I learn a height, weight or dwelling place. Who was this person really? And genealogical research, while fun, strikes me as a tool that is over-estimated and self-serving: Just imagine if you were written off as your job or religion or sports enthusiasm or parental status. How cock-eyed is that?

Just because "that's all we've got" does not mean anyone should credit "all we've got."

All of this sends me, associatively, to the word "gizzard," a delicious word to say and a function to admire. Does anyone know what a gizzard is any more? In a variety of animals -- I think of chickens -- the gizzard is a muscle containing a sack filled with pebbles or grit that masticates swallowed food and transmits it to the stomach for nourishment. Chickens have no teeth. Instead, they have gizzards.

When I was a kid at boarding school, everyone would fall out when it was time to slaughter chickens. The kids were not required to chop off the chicken's head -- assuming they were as squeamish as I about delivering the death blow -- but everyone was required to pluck the resulting carcasses, which would be dipped in a vat of boiling paraffin to ease the plucking process. The chicken was due to be served at some future date: What you plucked is what you ate. And in the process, you had to remove the innards -- heart, liver, gizzard and various other guts. It was a messy business ... nobody liked chicken-plucking day.

The kids learned how to handle the gizzard, which was about as big around as a silver dollar. Using the jack knives everyone carried, we learned to cut carefully along the perimeter and remove the greenish sack filled with stones that lay within. Failure to remove this sack would result in a bitter mouthful at the dinner table.

The gizzard -- purveyor of what brought nourishment to a creature whose nourishment was being redirected to the dinner table. The gizzard -- creating the essence and support factors of life and being. The gizzard -- by one measure, the essence of genealogy, the underpinning of what transmuted "this" to "that," the descriptor on whose shoulders the responsibility and definition of life rested. The nourishment emanated from the gizzard but could the gizzard be fairly tasked with a completely-satisfactory description of the life that eventually spat "me" out?

I have never really understood the smug assurance with which anyone might say, "blood is thicker than water," as if family and forbears could explain or excuse the actions of the present. Certainly there is some connection to the circumstances into which anyone is born, but to suggest that "blood" was the determinant or the most important thing? ... it won't wash ... at least for me.

It still doesn't tell me if the chicken farted under the covers. And just because "it's the best we've got" is no reason not to ask the impossible questions. Agreement is nice, but it can hardly be construed as the truth.

Hell, I don't even know if chickens fart.


Thursday, October 8, 2015

outer space

Like companionable lovers returning from a night's worth of food and fun, the crescent moon and morning star make their way out of the eastern horizon this morning. Close, but not too close, bright without destination or intention, they seem to make their way home while being at home and at ease.

Because they do not need to laugh, they seem to smile. All things are such good fortune that calling their links and lights "good fortune" oversteps itself. From where I sit on the porch, it is beautiful, but that's my problem, not theirs.

Together with a potent cup of black coffee, the day fills up, moves home and is already home with something less blatant than a Mona Lisa smile. Before the lips can utter "amen," the amen has twinkled and shone in the eastern sky. It is comforting and "hot damn" without either comfort or surprise.

Lordy!

Yesterday, at the enthusiastic suggestion of a friend, I watched a movie called "The Martian," a film that opened to wildly positive reviews earlier this month. The geek-centric story tells the tale of an astronaut left behind on the red planet when a storm forces the rest of the team to depart. The movie centers on the attempt to retrieve the left-behind astronaut.

I can see why some might like it, but I had to push myself to watch it to the end: There was lots of scientific gimcrack to divert the attention from the fact that there was hardly a plot worth mentioning. Where were the people? "The Martian" was a bit of safe-sex imagination and I don't care for safe-sex imagination. The movie seemed to me to limp along on the premise that when things threatened to become boring, it was sufficient to throw in another technological problem and solution.

Oh well, Hollywood can live with safe-sex even as it pretends to expand the sexual boundaries. I'll continue to vote for authors like Ursula LeGuin who take the sci-fi bull by the horns: When it comes to imagination, she has balls.

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

"God Hates Renoir"



It may fall a bit short of April Fools Day, but it tickles my humorous ivories nonetheless:
Protesters have demonstrated outside a Boston art gallery that is showing work by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, complaining that he "sucks at painting".
The group held placards bearing slogans like "God hates Renoir" and "Aesthetic terrorism" at the Museum of Fine Arts....
In a statement on Instagram, the group said: "The MFA's decision to hang Renoir paintings, considering the fact the museum has masterpieces by actually talented artist [sic] in storage, is a curatorial failing, and amounts to an act of Aesthetic Terrorism."

come and gone ... again

Passed along in email, this latest warning that the world is about to end:
Chris McCann, leader of the eBible fellowship and all-round God expert, believes the world will be engulfed and destroyed by a great fire on October 7.
Why is it that those who claim to believe in God invariably find some catastrophe ... a catastrophe that is God's doing and yet believers squirm and disagree with what God has in store for them? Why wouldn't they rather praise and welcome the apocalypse -- after all, God knows what he/she/it is doing, right? And since God's agenda supersedes man's puny longings, why bother mentioning it in the first place?

It is hard not to conclude that catastrophic predictions almost invariably have to do with the thinning financial resources at the organization predicting the catastrophe.

Anyway, by the time you read this, there may be no "you" left to read what is no longer "this."

Poof.

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

time ______ all wounds


This year marks the 70th anniversary of the end of the Second Sino-Japanese War, and as the few remaining Chinese veterans reach their 80s and 90s, time is running out to record their personal experiences of history. Photographer Li Qiang, a former photojournalist at the Beijing News and vice photo director at China Newsweek wanted to celebrate their contributions without glossing over their often painful pasts. After locating more than 50 veterans through archives and non-governmental organizations, he spent a month traveling to remote villages and towns in four provinces to photograph them.

POP QUIZ 

Fill in the blank:

TIME  _____  ALL WOUNDS.

A. HEALS
B. EMBELLISHES
C. CLARIFIES
D. AGGRAVATES
E. BLURS
F. REWRITES
G. SANCTIFIES
H. OTHER.....


Monday, October 5, 2015

good cop, bad cop, real cop


Cmdr. Glenn Evans
CHICAGO (AP) — When a West Side neighborhood decayed into a deadly shooting gallery, the Chicago police chief said he was sending his "best guy" into the fray to turn back the drug- and gang-fueled violence.
The chief called Cmdr. Glenn Evans his "favorite among my favorites," and Evans had delivered in his previous assignment. There had been 80 fewer shootings in the Grand Crossing neighborhood compared with the year before — the second largest drop anywhere in the city. Evans won gratitude from families who finally felt safe enough to sit on their porches.
But in December, the same officer who cleaned up those streets is scheduled to go on trial on charges that his no-holds-barred style of policing went beyond the law when he allegedly shoved a gun down a suspect's throat.
As all but a card-carrying member of the ACLU, I still have a hard time imagining living in a crime- riddled neighborhood, fearing for myself and my family, and not being grateful for someone who took the bull by the horns.

my Tea Party tantrum

Policy makers' approach
Usually, I can keep it in check, but now and then my Tea Party tantrum just gets the better of me. I am sick of being old and powerless; I am sick of politicians whose promises have no substance or vision; bad news pulses in my veins as maiming and dispossessing others gains yet another foothold through institutions like the Department of Homeland Security or Islamic State; unreconstituted nitwit drivers talk on their cell phones at red lights and are unprepared for a green ones; and everywhere opinion becomes an acceptable substitute for substantive consideration. A tsunami of anger wells up, infuriated in its helplessness. Part of the problem, of course, is that there is hope that somehow decency and civility and some sort of peaceful co-existence will evolve. Won't someone please-please-please take these assholes out behind the barn and tan their back sides?!

It's choleric. It's childish. And, from time to time, it's true.

Bit by aging bit the smog creeps in like the "Godzilla el Nino" in Australia -- fierce, unremitting, wounding, incalculable. And to this honest difficulty human beings want to add their own self-serving adventures?! It feels like a noose that is tightening, tightening, tightening. No "no" can stop or allay its onslaught ... and it is infuriating. Whichever way you look, things seem to push you back into a corner where you are forced to do the only thing you could do in the first place ... lead your own decent life.

In which regard, I guess it is time for me to repeat again a poem I find pointed and true and naughty enough to suit my tastes -- Ray Ronci's "Homage to My Father."

HOMAGE TO MY FATHER

My father said:
Fuck Father Farrell,
what does he know, that old bastard!

Study all the religions. Learn Italian.
See Venizia, Firenze, talk
to all kinds of people
and never, never think you know more
than someone else! Unless,
unless they're full of shit.

And if they are, tell them;
and if they still don't get it, fuck it,
there's nothing you can do about it.

Learn how to bake bread.
If you can make pasta and bake bread
you can always feed your family,
you can always get a job.

Keep your house clean
and don't worry what anyone else does.
Cut your grass,
prune your fruit trees
or they'll die on you.

Don't drink too much
but don't always be sober --
it makes you nervous.

A couple glasses of wine,
some anisette now and then,
a cigar never hurt nobody.

Nervous people always got an ache here,
an ache there, they get sick,
they die --

Look at Father Farrell:
he'll be dead in a year.

Fuck him!

Sunday, October 4, 2015

"Namaste" parody

I know I used this before, but I had occasion to re-find it this morning and thought it really deserved its own space ... grey day, a smile never hurt.
 

Frank's grandmother

Prickly and protective as some half-seen hedge row on a summer night, the guiding hand of memory asserts its ways. And within its shadowy walls there are the occasional explosions of some passing fire fly -- bright, insistent, delightful, magnetic. For a brief moment in a brief place, there is a wondrous light and then it is gone.

Blink.

Blink.

It is hard to know precisely if that light was imagined or real. One thing's for sure: Staring at the place where one blink formed a focal point will not assure that the blink will occur again any time soon. Or maybe it will ... you never know on a summer's night within the half-seen hedge rows.

This morning I awoke thinking of Frank's grandmother. Blink, blink. Whether the skein of thought was true or simply woven out of personal need, I don't know. Perhaps what I remember is true; perhaps it is just woven and embellished because I long for something to love and Frank's grandmother, true or false, is a small, chosen light.

Blink.

Blink.

Mostly I knew Frank's grandmother according to what Frank told me, but even that has grown wispy with the passage of time. Since I cannot know what is false and what is true, I choose to think it true and warm myself by the wonders I confect. Still, I do not even remember her name.

Frank's grandmother came to the United States in 1918. She came with her two young sons, following in the footsteps of a husband who had gone on ahead to create a new life in a new world. She came from Sicily and rode, like many hard-scrabble immigrants, on one of the lower decks of the ship that placed first-class passengers in the decks above.

While Frank's grandmother rode below decks, a wealthy man came down from above. He had entered into a May-December marriage that was destined to be childless and he offered to buy one of Frank's grandmother's sons. The suggestion was not so outlandish then as it may appear today: What parent would not wish the best for his or her child and which would not recognize the grinding power of poverty? Frank's grandmother refused and so Frank's father and uncle remained brothers beneath a single roof.

I met Frank's grandmother when Frank suggested I go with him to a dinner his grandmother would prepare. Frank and I were Zen students together -- friends -- and so I accepted.

I do not even remember what Frank's grandmother looked like, but in my hedge row of memory she is petite and wiry and straightforward as a paper clip. Her apartment was in a brick complex and was filled with just two things -- pictures of family and the aging palm fronds and votive candles of her Catholicism. In memory, I had an instant sense that this was a person of simple substance, with an equal emphasis on each word ... simple ... substance. She must have been in her 80's and it was clear as a fire fly -- this was a delightful person that was not to be fucked with.

As I recall it, Frank's grandmother did not want us coming into the kitchen to help her prepare the meal. That would have been improper. She was the cook. Period. A woman's work was what she did and she was not about to have her given role usurped. Frank and I sat at the table. She brought the food. We ate. That was the way of things. Period.

She had journeyed from Sicily with a saying Frank told me she was fond of: "Eat slow, but eat a lot." Imagine that -- from a land of "eat slow, but eat a lot" to a country whose prim forefathers were fond of Ben Franklin's admonition, "eat not to dullness, drink not to elevation." Frank's grandmother had her feet on the ground.

Nor was she shy about standing that ground. Frank told me that when the good-deed-prone Catholic priest would call on her from time to time, she would cuss him up one side and down the other for getting the prayers and rituals "wrong." She wasn't about to sit still for some whippersnapper and his improved theologies.

The dinner was everything and more a fire fly might deliver. I think I may still be digesting it. "A lot" is an understatement. I came away with a full belly and a distinct sense, however fabricated, of who and what Frank's grandmother was.

The next time I saw Frank's grandmother, she was in the intensive care unit in a hospital. The room was full of stainless steel and white sheets and deadly-neutral-colored walls covered with high-gloss paint. It drove me crazy from the moment I entered the room. I was wild to get a crucifix or palm frond or family portrait to put on the wall. This was a death chamber. Naturally such home-brewed bits of humanity were not allowed because they had germs. It was inhuman and inhumane in my mind ... a person on death's doorstep who must be kept free of what brought her life. Talk about "what-the-fuck!?"

I expressed myself to Frank and I don't know if his grandmother ever made it out of the ICU before she died. I like to think she died at home beneath a sappy Hallmark-calendar rendition of Jesus. At the wake, I received a little playing card with a picture of Mary and some Christian verse ... a small momento of Frank's grandmother. The card is still around here somewhere, but Frank's grandmother is still a fresh penny in my mins.

Frank's grandmother. Blink. Blink. How tall and telling in my mind -- a reminder in some small, bright way, that being who you are is possible and pulling the reins is for sissies. "Be alive!" her come-and-gone blink instructs in my mind.

True or false, does it matter?

I may just have made it all up among the hedge rows of memory ... does it matter?

From where I sit, it's still true, fabrications and all.

When I grow up, I want to be Frank's grandmother. Not really, of course, but still ... really.

Blink.

Blink.

Saturday, October 3, 2015

U.S. athletes critique British plumbing



The New York Jets [football team] shipped their own toilet paper to London for their clash with the Miami Dolphins, as they were warned British paper was "very thin".
New York Times sports reporter Ben Shpigel was writing an article about the logistics of bringing the NFL team over and obtained the shipping list....
It recorded 350 rolls of toilet paper along with other items such as cereal....
"There was an intern who had been over to London numerous times.
"He noticed when he was there that - and I quote - 'the toilet paper was very thin because their plumbing isn't as good'.
No word on how well British plumbing might survive when confronted by colonial toilet paper.

where "aberration" challenges "aberration"

Krysztof Charamsa
A Polish Roman Catholic priest who has "been a member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith - which is tasked with defending Church doctrine" has come out of the closet and been slapped down by the church he belongs to:
In an interview with the Corriere Della Sera, Mr Charamsa, said: "It's time the Church opened its eyes and realised that offering gay believers total abstinence from a life of love is inhuman.
"I also know that I will have to give up the ministry," he added, but said he felt he had a duty towards sexual minorities to come out.
The Vatican, for its part, said Krysztof Charamsa could no longer work at the Vatican or pontifical universities and added:
The decision to make such a pointed statement on the eve of the opening of the synod appears very serious and irresponsible, since it aims to subject the synod assembly to undue media pressure.
Charamsa has an understandable impetus to speak out for sexual minorities since he professes himself to be homosexual. But the echoes of his observation about the "inhumanity" of current doctrine spills ipso facto into the world of the sexual majority. Abstinence from a "life of love" is hardly limited by the objects of affection.

One man's "aberration" challenging another man's "aberration" -- what happens when the word "aberration" is expunged from scenarios in which no one is hurt

PS. I wonder if Christians consider "the immortal soul," a creation destined for heaven or hell I imagine they imagine, sexual by definition? Can it have a sexual identity? If it has an identity, can it be immortal? I don't plan to lose any sleep over it, but I do wonder when vast reaches are constrained into bite-sized morsels.

back to the Zen future

Black Moon Zendo ... an old friend in other times.
A time of tornado around the house as my older son collects his possessions, splices them into a U-Haul van and gears up to move to new digs and a new job in Plymouth, N.H. to the northeast. Boxes here, screw drivers there, shoes mingling with bits of computer gear and family members lending a hand. Outside of me (I don't work well or effectively any more), they will all trek to the new apartment this morning, unload, create what they can of a new environment ... and be done. Angus' new job as a college track coach begins in a few days and, despite the tightness of the fit that has existed around here, I will miss him as I miss each of my children as they "separate" from this place I live in and they have too.

All the activity seems to muddle my mind ... or stir an already stirred pot. Some part of me wants to rest and relax and be at ease in whatever assumptions weave such relaxation, but the assumptions are dashed against the activity of the present. It's a minor matter ... to everyone but me.

In the midst of this mulligan stew a small 'surprise' bomb dropped yesterday when I received an email out of the blue from a Zen student looking for a place to relocate the small sangha (group) of which he is part. Would there be any chance that Black Moon Zendo could share its facilities?

The idea had never occurred to me and yet, when asked the question, it made perfectly good sense -- an unused building used to the purpose for which it was originally intended and yet had fallen into disuse with my advancing age. I loved being surprised by the suggestion. It took me back to a time of construction; to a time when Sunday mornings were sometimes cold enough so that, even with the electric radiator going, my breath was visible on the air; to sittings I sat although few if any came to sit with me ... of times gone by when getting into a robe and raksu were what happened on Sunday mornings and sometimes other times as well. I was then, I suppose, a "Zen student," although no one who ever sat/practiced zazen ever considered him- or herself a "Zen student" while actually sitting.

It was fun to go back. And it was enticing, imagining a future. As that 12x16 building had been a friend to me, so I liked imagining it might be a friend to others. And there was something humorous in the notion that I might become a Zen landlord. It won't work, I imagine, but I like imagining it.

It won't work because it's too small, too poorly appointed (upscale heat and air conditioning are expected in what is imagined as a sharp-stick practice). It's too demanding and besides, the parking situation around here is not abundant. Where I learned to sweat and shiver ... well, that was me. No, it will come to nothing ... but it was a surprise and I enjoyed it.

I sent an email saying I was open to the idea, but I'm not holding my breath even if the questioner gets back to me.

Still, it is an occasion on which I can recognize how good it was to have such a friend.

Friday, October 2, 2015

saved from salvation

Sometimes it takes a helping hand to extract the seeker from the life-giving nourishment he or she might seek and then find.

Take the case of the leopard in India that got its head stuck in a pot containing water....

not just pillow talk

Dutch brothel owners must be able to communicate with sex workers in their own language to protect them from abuse, the EU's top court has ruled.
The authorities in Amsterdam were right to refuse a brothel owner permission to operate because he could not speak Hungarian or Bulgarian, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) said.
Brothels are legal in the Netherlands and must be licensed locally.But the authorities are trying to tackle human trafficking and abuse. 
ECJ rulings are binding throughout the 28-member EU.

c'mon -- don't be an asshole

If, as I imagine it, everyone invariably embraces what they claim to abhor, what honest conclusion can be drawn? I don't mean this in some snarky, intellectual sense, but rather in a sense that will address the desire to be happy and at peace.

To cite one admittedly-inflammatory example, I think of those who adamantly oppose abortion, calling it "murder," calling on the "sanctity of life as given from God," calling on a variety of biblically-linked encouragements ... it is heart-felt stuff: Life is sacred, ergo....

But the same people who oppose abortion often turn out to rally bearing an American flag to indicate a patriotic connection with their ethical cause. Abortion, the implication seems to be, is not only antithetical to God's will, it is also antithetical to American values that live cheek by jowl with God's dicta, imagined and otherwise.

If life is sacred and abortion is murder, by what Jesuitical tapdancing do those who oppose abortion not likewise oppose the wars prosecuted under the American flag? Wouldn't you imagine they would be dyed-in-the-wool peaceniks? Life is sacred: Anyone who tries to suggest 'this' life is sacred but not 'that' one really has a narrow view of God and his or her dictates. Can anyone claim that sending Americans to be killed or wounded is somehow not disrespectful of life? Can anyone claim that the Afghan woman weeping over the dead baby in her arms is not butchered by the same sorrow that slices the parents of babies who have grown into young adults? C'mon -- don't be an asshole.

But of course we are all assholes, waving the flags whose colors we strike at the first sign that my whims and whimsies, attachments and greed will not be assuaged. I really do abhor whatever-it-is ... and am as capable as the next fellow of creating a smarmy matrix of 'principles' to support my position ... and yet, when circumstances demand, I lower the flag and descend into the very hell I have claimed to abhor.

In Oregon yesterday, nine/10 people were shot and killed and another seven wounded (figures vary) when a 26-year-old gunman opened up in an Umpqua Community College classroom in Oregon. The motive(s) have yet to be sorted out and nailed down in the way that always follows such horrors ... if you name and describe, somehow the deed is more manageable and it is easier to go back to a previously-held matrix.

As if to bring perspective to a situation riven in Oregon by sadness there was this:
Step-sister Carmen Nesnick told KCBS-TV the shooting didn't make sense.
"All he ever did was put everyone before himself, he wanted everyone to be happy," she said.
"He wanted everyone to be happy" ... as if that stood in contrast to the deeds committed rather than being seen as a contributor and support mechanism for those deeds. There is something to be said for a certain wariness when someone wants "everyone to be happy." Who knows what lengths they will go to in order to insure their vision of what is desirable and what is abhorrent?

Up the street, my neighbors Mac and Claudia own a Toyota on whose rear bumper is a sticker that says, "War is not the answer." I cringe when I see it. "Of course it's not the answer, you smug twits!" I want to say. "A war whose horrors depend on "peace" for its definition will always be a war. A peace that depends on war for its definition will always lead to more war. Get real!"

Get real ... that's too crabby by half, I imagine, but making nice gets under my skin after a while. Making nice ain't being nice. But being nice requires an effort that is utterly personal. Or anyway, that's the way I see it: There's no way out of this adore-abhor world short of reflection ... and yeah, I would argue it is easier to shoot up a classroom.

Personally, I would prefer not to be guilty of what I abhor. I don't want to be tarred by my own abhorrent brush. I want to be good and happy and peaceful and smiley and ... you know, the sweet and enjoyable and placatory and praise-worthy and ethically elevated stuff. It beats the cruel stuff all to hell in a hundred ways ... but its mediocrity and incompleteness and falsehood has a way of coming around and biting me on the ass.

The Zen Buddhist teacher Ta Hui (and I am not here suggesting anyone take up or not take up Buddhism) once observed
I have always taken a great vow that I would rather suffer the fires of hell for all eternity than to portray Zen as a human emotion.
Ah, my precious adoring and abhorring emotions. How I love them. How I will defend them ... perhaps to the death.

Isn't it enough -- or perhaps too much -- to know that I am accountable? Where else could there possibly be peace?

Thursday, October 1, 2015

"après moi le déluge"

The 18th century French king Louis XV is credited -- with some help from Madame de Pompadour -- with the line, "après moi le déluge" (after me, the flood). Both aristocrats are credited with seeing the French Revolution in the offing but I wonder to what extent anyone imagines that with the passage of their own life's tapestry, somehow the world will fall into disarray: "Things would be more sensible and wholesome and nourishing if only my way were the way of the world."

And further, I wonder how the French king's haughty pronouncement might dovetail with the intellectually-flummoxing conundrum the Buddha Gautama posed when, on attaining something blithely referred to as "enlightenment," was said to have taken seven steps in each of the cardinal directions and then, with his right hand raised to heaven and his left hand pointing to the earth, said, "Above the heavens and below the earth, I alone am the world-honored one."

I am what is. 

Without me everything goes to hell in a hand basket.

I wonder how deep that supposition goes.

"It's apples and oranges!" the well-warmed Buddhists might crow: Louis was expressing the insufferable arrogance that any aristocrat might whereas Gautama was speaking from a deeper understanding of what "self" might mean.

And maybe it's true.

On the other hand, maybe it's not.

True or false? "I am what is."

inching up on instant gratification

And, in the gimme-what-I-want-and-give-it-to-me-NOW department:
The co-founder of Australian online retailer Shoes of Prey, which allows customers to design their own footwear, hopes to one day allow customers to print out pairs at home as technology improves and consumer demand grows for personalized products.
Founded in 2009, Shoes of Prey allows women to create unique designs on its website, choosing from 300,000 trillion possible permutations of materials, colors, styles and sizes. It promises to deliver in four weeks but often manages two.
Jodie Fox, who set up Shoes of Prey in 2009 with former Google Inc employees Michael Fox and Mike Knapp, expects consumer demand for faster delivery to keep rising.
"Ideally we would get to a point ... where we are able to (deliver) overnight a pair of shoes to you that you designed the day before," Fox said in a telephone interview from Sydney....
"Honestly, Shoes of Prey is not about shoes. It is about this whole idea of getting you what you want, when you want it, and that will extend into many products," Fox said.

peace in our times

Responding to a comment that despaired of the direction the United States was heading in, I wrote yesterday:
Relax ... with any luck, the Department of Homeland Security will join forces with the fundamentalist patriots and we'll soon have a theocracy that will rival Islamic State's most anal-retentive wet dreams. [There will be] Peace and harmony and everyone wearing a mask.
I guess it was tongue-in-cheek, but that's just guessing.

the comforting nature of maps


The View of The World from 9th Avenue by Saul Steinberg is a ‘map’ that gives absurd prominence to Manhattan (Credit: Saul Steinberg/New Yorker)

Maps, as implied in a BBC feature, hold out a wondrous promise: The way is sure; the destinations clear; the dangers apparent ... and it's all laid out in a way that soothes the uncertain mind. Beauty and accuracy vie for top billing on maps.

And yet, without getting unduly snarky about it, maps are invariably incomplete. They point out this but overlook that. Yes, a map may show the way to Tulsa, but what of the particulars of the journey? Maps have helped to call theology into question. Maps have been drawn and redrawn in an effort to match the certainties the mind imagines in a map. It never works, but the mind is nonetheless insistent about its certainty and sense of relief that "it," whatever "it" is, can be shown for sure.

Interesting to think how a man or woman may draw maps in the mind and, like literal cartographers, tweak the scene from moment to moment as a means of  certainty, of an ease and of a place to rest assured.

Vote Democrat.
Vote Republican.
Money will make things better.
Money will make things worse.
War is the answer.
War is not the answer.
Marriage will fill the bill.
Marriage will not fill the bill.
Integrity.
Immorality.

Mapping, mapping, mapping ....

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

the elderly prostitutes of S. Korea

South Korea's hot and upscale economy has served a cold and bitter plate to many of its aging women and men.

The Confucian reverence for family loses its footing.

It is sad.

"Life is too short to learn German"

"Life is too short to learn German."

I had never been aware of the quote but appreciate its wit, which is used to set off a Reuters correspondent's feature about immigrants who need to -- but are not always constrained to -- learn German in Germany where the economy is fat.

Strange how handicapped Americans are when it comes to knowing foreign languages ... and consequently, without really being aware of it, how arrogant in their ignorance. I was fortunate to have gone to what was then called the Army Language School to learn -- ick -- German.

Tocqueville was right: America is defended by two oceans. He neglected, to the best of my recollection, to note that America was similarly hemmed in.

ad hominem leanings

Anyone who is seriously interested in a topic recognizes the mistake of an "ad hominem" argument.

"Ad hominem" (Latin: "to the man/person") arguments critique the person espousing a position and by extension dismisses the position involved. Briefly, an asshole making an argument is making an asshole argument. As Wikipedia puts it, ad hominem argument "means responding to arguments by attacking a person's character, rather than addressing the content of their arguments."

In serious discussion, ad hominem arguments are generally frowned upon as both fallacious and idiotic, however common. Deriding a (wo)man is hardly a reason to deride or dismiss the position that (wo)man advances.

In serious discussion, such a technique is frowned upon.

I wonder, in light of this approach, why it is that thinking highly of a (wo)man should not excite a similar displeasure when hearing his/her arguments. Whether the person involved is a sage or an idiot ... either way, ad hominem thinking can only infrequently be involved in assessing the issue at hand. And yet such skepticism is sometimes given a 'bye' when listening to someone who is admired or lauded.

If the Dalai Lama says so, well ... maybe I like the Dalai Lama. If Karl Rove makes an argument, well ... maybe I dislike Karl Rove. Is my skepticism and critical-thinking capacity bruised by my personal leanings? I imagine it well might be.

What then happens to the issue at hand?

eyecatching headstone

Passed along in email:

Background

all middle and no side

Oooooosh!

Not "WH-ooosh" but "oooosh" -- that was the nature of the rain that fell in this morning's predawn darkness ... fat and strong and positively everywhere ... in every direction there was nothing but the middle of it. I guess that's the nature of everything, but it's hard not to fantasize that there is a beginning and end to things, that there is an accomplishment or an escape or an excuse somewhere out there.

Where do you go when there is nothing but the middle? Of course the "middle" means the edges, but what happens where that meaning is erased and everything is just, somehow, the middle ... the oooosh of the moment?

Through this guzzling, dolloping rain, Tracy arrived with the newspaper at 5:49. I stood in the porch doorway to greet and thank her and receive her delivery. She tossed newspapers on various stoops and stood in the middle without ever worrying about the "middle" or the "oooosh." Tracy is a plump woman in her late forties or early fifties ... delivering newspapers in an economy said to be on the upswing.

I admire Tracy and people like her -- the ones who actually break a sweat on behalf of those whose only sweat involves trying to cement a lifestyle in which they won't have to break a sweat. For every man or woman who sits down to a second latte of the morning, idly perusing an iPad or other bit of electronic "connectedness," there is someone who must literally break a sweat and does so unnoticed, even by themselves. Theirs is a middle like anyone else's but at the end of the day, they have actually accomplished something, as in delivering the newspaper.

It is too much to praise the 'working class' or some similar segment of social life. And yet, for me, to let the sweat-breakers go unnoticed isn't quite right either. Yes, the upstairs-downstairs dichotomy makes for yet another British recollection, but aside from that, I admire those who break a literal sweat so that, among other things, others may speak in dulcet and well-modulated tones. At least the sweat-breakers may have a loaf of bread to show for it.

That and, perhaps, something like honor.