"Cult," a negatively-freighted word that has an inbred overlay, is defined by an Internet dictionary as:
-- a religious group, especially one with beliefs that most people consider strange or dangerous
-- a religious system in which people worship a particular god, person, or object
-- extreme admiration for someone or something
In Ohio, "seven of the 16 people charged in beard- and hair-cutting attacks on fellow Amish in Ohio want any references to a cult or renegade group banned from their upcoming trial," according to the Associated Press.
Anyone who belongs to a particularly devoted occupation might not wish to be labeled as a "cult" and yet still be dependent on "most people" to extend that courtesy.
I wonder what the opposite of "cult" is.
Is it simply "majority rules?"
Or maybe, "I won't call your group a cult if you will do the same for mine?"
Is "cult" like "love" or "terrorism" -- something that attains a critical mass of agreement without bothering to examine the particulars?
Enjoyment, expertise, love, hate and a lot of other experiences evolve from a focused approach. And a lack of a focused approach leads to confusion, sloppiness, uncertainty, etc. Family life, NASCAR, kittens, employment ... pick your poison: Each has its potential for nourishing satisfaction and for harmful idiocy.
What is the opposite of "cult?"
If "most people" agree, does that make them a cult?
.
No comments:
Post a Comment