By ADAM FISHER
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
(Published in print: Wednesday, October 30, 2013)
(Published in print: Wednesday, October 30, 2013)
NORTHAMPTON — It is
hard not to imagine that the trustees at Westfield State University are
outmanned and outgunned when it comes to fighting with suspended
President Evan S. Dobelle.
It is hard not to posit that this is true because Dobelle seems to have had practice where the university trustees have not.
It is hard not to
imagine that, yes, Dobelle will be fired in the end, but he will leave
town with a fistful of dollars that might otherwise have been spent on
the needs of the university. And if any of this is true, it is hard not
to wonder if those trustees were asleep at the wheel when they hired
Dobelle in the first place.
Evan Dobelle was warmly
welcomed at WSU in 2007. There was no mention at the time that Dobelle
had been fired by the University of Hawaii in 2004. Trustees in Hawaii
at first wanted to fire Dobelle “for cause,” a phrase that would have
excused the university from paying him the $2.26 million in severance
written into his contract. Dobelle hired a lawyer and, by the time the
dust settled, he left town with $1.83 million and a promise not to sue
the university, among other stipulations.
As is usual in
kerfuffles like the one at the University of Hawaii, no one ever got
around to detailing what actual “cause” for firing there might have been
in Dobelle’s case. Lawyers made sure of that. But it seems fair to
guess that the trustees were not picking a fight with Dobelle because of
the way he parted his hair. They were, for one reason or another,
“concerned” (the bureaucratic word), or “ticked off” (the street
translation).
Dobelle’s current
difficulties center on his domestic and overseas spending with
university and Westfield State Foundation credit cards.
I have no doubt that
Dobelle’s career may include some well-deserved kudos — that his career
is, as his current lawyer Ross Garber alleges in a 40-page federal
lawsuit filed in Springfield, “long celebrated.” But in the same way a
police or journalistic entity might consider the background of a suspect
or politician, Dobelle’s adventures at the University of Hawaii strike
me as relevant and perhaps revealing.
According to the
Honolulu Star Bulletin, “Dobelle’s contract defined ‘cause’ as either
conviction for a felony offense; a determination by doctors that he is
mentally unstable or otherwise unable to perform the duties of his
office; or conduct that constitutes ‘moral turpitude,’ bringing public
disrespect or ridicule upon the university.” Whatever the foundations of
the 2004 dustup — whether spending habits or something else — Dobelle
came out a winner in Hawaii and three years later landed a job as
president at a smaller institution that is testing his legal expertise
of the past.
My money is on Dobelle: He knows the game and is good at playing it.
But the trustees who I
imagine will write the eventual check deserve questioning. Finding out
the substance of the issues at the University of Hawaii is hardly rocket
science ... pick up the phone, ask around. Academics gossip as well as
any Hollywood star.
Did the issue there have
anything to do with spending habits? In the course of vetting Dobelle,
did the WSU trustees get to the substance of the matter and find out
what particular flaw or flaws occasioned the flap? If they didn’t, why
not?
And if they did, did
they add language to Dobelle’s WSU contract that might short-circuit the
activities of the past and forestall them in the future ... as for
example now?
Were any red flags
raised about this potential employee? And even if the trustees win the
case, how much will be spent on lawyer’s fees? Of course, there may
already be contractual language that will allow WSU trustees to avoid
writing a check to Evan S. Dobelle.
Others may be more sanguine, but I, for one, am not holding my breath.
Adam Fisher lives in Northampton and is a regular contributor to the Gazette.
Someone should check Dobelle's reign as head of Trinity U. in Hartford, where the faculty were pretty thoroughly upset with the guy. Worth contacting faculty and former faculty there. Good luck.
ReplyDelete