Subject: Fwd: Trust but
verify (joe dowling email)
Date: November 19,
2015 at 3:14:28 AM HST
Dear Sangha,
Having served
on the Board of the ZSS (2006-12) before and during the crisis that started on June
21, 2010,
as of today, I’ve never gone public on the Internet or blogs or the infamous
Shimano Archives in any way. It didn’t seem right. There were too many people
opining who had no real knowledge of the facts, plus others with axes to grind.
Over these 5 years about 20/25 people stuck it out and have attended Shoboji on
a regular basis, and lately some new, younger people are very active. Up at
DBZ, Shinge Roshi’s monks, residents and Kessei students, have kept the zen
lamp alive at our beautiful, well-kept mountain zendo. The new boilers were
recently installed.
I will be at
All Souls on 11/21 for the meeting and ask all of you to consider what I have
to say and take a look at the attached documents before then.
The last time
the entire ZSS sangha was called to a special meeting like this was in July of
2011 to hear “an important announcement” from Eido Shimano. (see attachment,
#1). The problem with this statement is that it was proven totally false. After
announcing his retirement, Mr. Shimano left and went directly to Europe to hold sesshin, and since then he
has actively cultivated a group of student followers (many of whom were at the
July 2011 meeting and heard this announcement.) This fact alone would make me
skeptical about another special meeting of the Sangha, but there is more.
The real
reason for that meeting quickly surfaced. Mr. Shimano, along with his
supporters who were a vocal majority, tried to force those directors of the ZSS
Board in attendance to have an immediate public vote on amending a recently
adopted Board Access Policy. That July day the Board ultimately decided there
would be no vote. It was against the ZSS By-laws to have a meeting with no
prior notice and not all directors were there to waive that provision. In
addition, as president, I felt it was totally out of bounds for anyone to try
to coerce the Board this way. That’s when homophobic slurs and threats of
violence started. Someone grappled with Kanze (R.I.P.) who was trying to
protect others. A video recording of this chaotic scene was taken by Zensho
Martin Hara.
Thus, we need
to be wary of what will transpire on the 21st.
We can’t let Mr. Shimano control the agenda or his followers to pack the meeting.
So I urge all who want the Zen Studies Society to flourish to come to All
Soul’s Episcopal Church on Saturday afternoon.
We also can’t
allow Mr. Shimano to give another generic apology. (See attachment, #2) To
regain our credibility in the contemporary Buddhist community and the wider
cyber-connected world the Society needs to totally clear the air of past
cover-ups, lies and downright dishonesty (e.g., Roshi-letter 2/1). There will
be no healing and no real peace until Mr. Shimano comes clean and rectifies as
much as he can of the hurt he has caused the present and historical sangha. If
he remains stuck in the belief that he himself is simply one of the injured
parties with no attempt at taking responsibility for specific things he did and
said; then there’s no hope for real reconciliation. Making amends means talking
to real individuals, apologizing in private, not uttering generalities in open
meetings.
Some will
say, hey Soun, it’s time to forgive and forget. Yet we know those who ignore
the past are certain to relive it. Of course, I’d like to see a final peace
descend over our still active sangha. But not at the cost we will incur if we
let Mr. Shimano get by with a general apology, skipping over all particulars.
There are some specific names and dates I know I’d like to ask him about. Maybe
Mr. Shimano is planning on holding private meetings with those he has used and
hurt; perhaps he already has. I hope to hear that at the meeting.
Gassho,
Soun Joe
Dowling
#1
________________________________________
Eido T. Shimano
Abbot
The Zen Studies Society
Dai Bosatsu Zendo ·
Kongo-Ji
223 Beecher Lake Road
Livingston Manor, New York 12758-6000
Telephone (845) 439-4566
Facsimile (845) 439-3119
December 1, 2010
News Editor
The New York Times
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10018
Re: "Sex Scandal
Has American Buddhists Looking Within" - published
Saturday, August
21.2010, The New York Times National section
Dear Sir,
It has been three months
since the article written about me appeared in your
National Section. In
this day and age, it quickly spread all over the world and, I am told, was
translated into Japanese. I was hurt deeply. However, I endured for more than
three months and endeavored to calm down. Since this is the year that I am
planning to retire, I do not want this article and my retirement to be linked.
One has nothing to do with the other – there is no cause and effect.
As the date for my
retirement is nearing, I think that at the very least, I need to
point out the
inappropriate attitude of the writer of the article and the misinformation
contained in his piece. I highlight the following:
1. Mr. Oppenheimer did
not inter-View me for this article, nor did he speak
with Mr. Aitken or the
young woman who is referred to in the article. The article states that he
attempted to contact me and that I did not return several phone calls - this is
just not true. I was never contacted by Mr. Oppenheimer, nor did I receive any
correspondence from him at either my Livingston Manor address or my New York City
2. It is clear to me
from reading the article and knowing the facts, that Mr. Oppenheimer obtained
his information from second and third hand sources and the opinions expressed
therein are neither factual nor backed up by proof. In fact, none of the
individuals who have been quoted in the article were at-the dinner table when the
purported statement was made and therefore they could not have
"overheard" what was said.
3. In addition, I have
not resigned because of these false accusations. At the
beginning of this year,
during a meeting of the Board of Directors in January, I made an announcement
that 2010 was the 50 year anniversary of my being in America and that I planned to
do a final fund .raising for a mountain gate entrance for the monastery and
would step down from the Abbot. This fundraising was to be the final act in a 50
year career in the United States. The article falsely
states that I am stepping down from the Abbot because of allegations. Moreover,
I would like to mention the following: When the article appeared, I was in Switzerland doing a silent retreat.
When I returned to the United States, many people brought
this article to my attention. The effect has been profound. Many people are
hurt and confused. As an aside, minutes from our Board of Directors meetings
are private documents. If they wound up in Hawaii or in Mark
Oppenheimer's possession, they were improperly obtained and/or delivered. Did
anyone question why Mr. Aitken would write about a Buddhist monk for 50 years,
when I have had contact with him only twice since 1964? I shall look forward to
hear what your journalist, Mark Oppenheimer,
has to say about the
contents of my letter.
Very truly yours,
EidoT.Shimano, Abbot
________________________________________
#2
The following statements
were made on July 2nd, 2011 at Dai Bosatsu Zendo
Kongo-ji, with about 45 sangha members from DBZ, New York Zendo Shobo-ji and
the Zen Center of Syracuse in attendance.
Eido Roshi:
Good afternoon. Thank
you for coming to Dai Bosatsu Zendo for this rather important meeting. The day
after tomorrow will be July 4th. In 1776 this nation became independent, and
just two hundred years later, in 1976, this Zendo was dedicated. Last year, on July 4th 2010, Aiho and I resigned from the Board of
Directors after forty-five years of service.
Of course, everybody
knows that this Zendo and Shobo-ji in New York were established
because of thousands and thousands of people's help. But Aiho and I are the
only two still here from the beginning to this point, still thinking and
dedicating—rather, combusting—our Dharma passion.
We are in the midst of a
transition period. This transition is nothing new for other places: in a
monastery from former abbot to new abbot, in a
company from former
president to new. What is unique in our case is that The Zen Studies Society
has never experienced an official transition.
When I took over the
inactive Zen Studies Society from Dr. D. T. Suzuki, he had gone to Japan. During the transition
from Dr. Suzuki's time to my time, the secretary was very happy to give to me
all the documents and the corporate seal. In this case, during the past year –
particularly the past six months – we all suffered. The Sangha suffered, the
Board of Directors suffered, and I suffered. Unless we come to some kind of
positive, corrective, and peacefully harmonious solution today, The Zen Studies
Society, Dai Bosatsu Zendo and New York Zendo will all be in trouble.
Please do not think you
are the only ones who suffered. We all suffered in one way or another. In my
case, many sleepless nights continued and finally I got shingles, full of pain,
which still continues. In the midst of this pain I asked, what is the best way
to solve this painful situation – not only my physical pain, but the Sangha's
pain? I thought this way and that, and came to the conclusion – and naturally
everyone would agree – that the Dharma is the most important and it must
continue.
In the meantime, I have
received about sixty letters, telephone calls, faxes and person-to-person
contacts saying, "Please continue to teach. I will miss you. Don't abandon
us." I thought, this might be true, but suppose I were dying. If that were
the case, these kinds of phone calls, faxes and letters would not have been
written. Then I thought, it must be a kind of attachment in the Rinzai Zen
tradition.
As you know, there is
dokusan. That is a unique practice, and by doing so we struggle and we grow.
Sometimes during sesshin we have dokusan three times a day. The more we meet,
the more some kind of deep emotions may develop along with the Dharma. This
could be called
attachment. Then I
thought, wait a minute – if I accept their request, their "Please
continue," for one more year, two more years, three more years, then the
problem is the same, maybe even worse. I introspected and asked myself, am I
attached to my students or not? The answer was yes. Some of you have been doing
zazen and dokusan with me twenty years, thirty years. Naturally what could be
called attachment by both parties grew. I thought, this is not the way to solve
this transition period. I have to retire. I have to sacrifice and they have to
sacrifice. Sometimes things have to be sacrificed.
After long days of
thinking, I now have the following attitude: starting today, I highly recommend
– I strongly suggest – that all of you become Shinge Roshi's students. That is
the only way that One Sangha, like it used to be, can be created under her
leadership. Of course, my style of teaching and her style of teaching are
different, our personalities are different, and many other things are
different. But the Dharma – which has been transmitted from Hakuin Zenji, to
Gempo Roshi, to Soen Roshi, to me and to her – is not different. She is the
only one, at this point, who can take on this big task and responsibility. I
have confidence in her, and we are also responsible for encouraging her growth
so that The Zen Studies Society's Chairman of the Board and Abbot will be
Shinge Roshi only.
I have retired, but some
of you may think, "Are there any exceptions?" No. I will stop doing
dokusan and giving teisho in a formal way. Some of you may feel uncomfortable
at first because you are not used to Shinge Roshi. I have experienced this
personally. When I first went to Heirin-ji as an unsui, the Roshi over there
was Shirosu Keisan Roshi. Three years later, I moved to Ryutaku-ji and became a
student of Soen Roshi. Their teaching styles were very different, and for a
while I was "not together." But there was karmic congeniality between
Soen Roshi and myself, and later I thought that my period of confusion was a
gift. By
passing through that
confusion I became stronger. In Japan, if an old Roshi is
going to retire—for either health reasons or some other reason—there will be
confusion among the training monks. Some leave, some stay, some are
confused...but it ends up most of the time that half of them remain and half go
somewhere else.
I don't want this to
happen at Dai Bosatsu Zendo, but if I completely retire and you don't support
Shinge Roshi, the life of DBZ will come to an end. This is nobody's wish. When
I think of the fifty to sixty students who wrote me such passionate letters, I
feel so bad. But if I am weak now, and take them back, this will not work. So,
my thoughts and my feelings are always with you, whether you love me or hate
me. This is the only way we can recreate One Sangha, with harmonious
togetherness. For some of you it must be quite difficult to hear such a
declaration. You may say, "How mean you are!" But this is the only
way. This is the only way.
When I come here, Shinge
Roshi and the residents always cheerfully welcome me. Although I don't attend
sesshin anymore, and I will not do dokusan anymore – in any place – I do visit
from time to time. This is my life! I gave my life to the Dharma and I hope
that this can peacefully be continued here and at New York Zendo Shobo-ji. I
think I have said clearly what my attitude is from now on, and beyond that, it
is up to you.
When esangha imploded, i expressed my dismay and disappointment to my teacher. And she gave it back to me for having an expectation that a community of buddhists might be different from any other community. So i own that, and this. How unfortunate that this troll should still be dragging the community he had taken responsibility through a muck of his making.
ReplyDelete