CLEVELAND (AP) — The centuries-old process of releasing defendants on
bail, long the province of judicial discretion, is getting a major assist ... courtesy of artificial intelligence....
Experts say the use of these risk assessments may be the biggest
shift in courtroom decision-making since American judges began accepting
social science and other expert evidence more than a century ago.
Christopher Griffin, a research director at Harvard Law School’s Access
to Justice Lab, calls the new digital tools “the next step in that
revolution.”
Critics, however, worry that such algorithms might end up supplanting
judges’ own judgment, and possibly even perpetuate biases in ostensibly
neutral form.
AI gets a lot of attention for the jobs it eradicates. That’s not
happening to judges, at least not yet. But as in many other white-collar
careers that require advanced degrees or other specialized education,
AI is reshaping, if not eliminating, some of judges’ most basic tasks —
many of which can still have enormous consequences for the people
involved.
See the upside. See the downside. Pick a side.
I see it as just another level of evading responsibility. I was just following orders. I don't make the rules. And now a running gag from the TV show Little Britain, "computer says no".
ReplyDelete