various recent conversations put me in mind of it, I will put it here so I'll know where to find it -- a 30-plus-year-old incident that had some impact in its time, but now is just a small shard in the mosaic of depredations of the Zen teacher Eido Tai Shimano.
SHAME (6/10/13)
Shortly before 3 a.m.
on Oct. 5, 1982, a
forty-two-year-old house painter and Zen student got out of bed, sipped a
little cold coffee and headed out the door of his 88th
Street apartment in Manhattan.
He was sleepy. He was scared. And he was determined.
As he walked south along Third
Avenue, the streets were largely empty. A few
trucks, a few taxis and a few buses plied their trade, but in a city as
jam-packed as New York, this was
an empty time and the emptiness seemed to compound his sense of fear. What if
he were seen or caught red-handed breaking the law? How could he deny that the
plastic bag in his right hand contained cans of spray paint and that the spray
paint belonged to him?
Nineteen blocks later, he turned left on 69th
Street and walked east until he stood in front of
356 East 69th, a handsome brownstone in an equally-handsome neighborhood and
home to Eido Tai Shimano, a Zen Buddhist teacher who had collected an
often-well-heeled following since his arrival in the United
States 20-or-more years before.
The sandstone stairs leading up to the front door lay in
partial shadow, partial street-lamp light.
The forty-two-year-old house painter and Zen student
withdrew one of the spray cans from his bag, shook it until the small steel
ball within rattled to indicate the paint was well-mixed, and then sprayed
first one and then another of the sandstone stairs: "SHAME." The
paint had been deliberately purchased in an oil-base form -- something that
could not be washed off easily as water-base paint might be. With luck, it
would be mostly dry before the sun came up and the lawbreaker's handiwork was
discovered.
With a sense of partial relief, the man replaced the can in
the bag, looked up and down the street to check for witnesses and walked away.
The relief was partial because there was one more stop to make, one more law to
break.
Two blocks away, at 223 East 67th
St., lay the Zen temple Shobo Ji, a converted
carriage house with an ornate set of double doors. How many times had the Zen
student and house painter lovingly stripped and sanded and revarnished those
doors over his eight-plus years of Zen practice? It was many and he had been
happy to do it ... but not today, not Oct.
5, 1982. Today was a day on which to withdraw another spray can,
shake it, and spray on the temple doors he had maintained ...
"SHAME."
This was the temple that Eido Shimano's followers had
provided for him. He 'ran' it. It was through his efforts that the idea had
become a reality. His followers were quick to credit his efforts but less
capable of acknowledging that without them, he and his efforts would have been
meaningless. Eido Shimano did not disabuse his loyal followers. He accepted and
subtly encouraged their fealty. He was the who of Zen Studies Society, the
umbrella organization that oversaw both Shobo Ji and the monastery in the
Catskills, Dai Bosatsu.
And now, today, one of his followers was drawing a line ...
SHAME. On the one hand, it was just a bit of scurrilous graffiti. On the other,
it was a summing up of Shimano's previous and future years as what some called
a "Zen master." He had manipulated and abused women students ... and
would again. He had manipulated and abused the finances of Zen Studies Society
... and would again. There was no pervasive Internet use at the time and so it
had taken years for the evidence to accumulate and make itself felt: Shimano
had betrayed is own teachings and hurt quite a lot of people into the bargain.
Was there a better word than SHAME?
The forty-two-year-old house painter and Zen student was, of
course, me. It was I who was tired and determined and scared. I was scared not
just that the police might catch and prosecute me but also that I might incur
some mystical wrath from the brightness of the Zen Buddhism I had followed as
best I might: Not only were the cops going to hit me on the nose with a rolled
up newspaper, but the Buddhist tradition itself might exact some fearsome,
hell-bound, karmic price. Toe the mark or risk reprisal ... that was Shimano's
teaching and I too had ingested it. But not today, not Oct. 5, 1982.
Looking back on that one small adventure, that shard in the
mosaic that is Shimano's corruption, I am no longer afraid. In fact, there is a
part of me which pats a younger and more frightened me on the back.
I was right.
Buddhism is worth the risk.
PS. For those seeking some verification of Eido Shimano's self-anointing adventures, a good source is the Shimano Archives. Those wishing corroboration of the spray-painting incident may want to peruse a letter Eido Shimano sent to the sangha ... the letter itself is a wonderful example of Shimano's executive ability not to address issues directly.
Thank you Adam for posting this; I have never come across it before and reading it today is timely. I delight vicariously through your delinquency. Wish I'd been there.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite sentence in Shimano's response to you and your co-conspirators is "I have been able to help them though it is difficult for me to articulate what I feel I have done for them".
Funny he never questions his helpfulness to others...
Sorry, Patricia, but there was no conspiracy, at least as far as the spray-painting went. I don't recall telling anyone, before or immediately after the event. Later I 'fessed up to a couple of people.
ReplyDeleteYou were alone in the delinquent act, but George and Frank also called him out, no?
ReplyDeletePatricia -- That is correct.
ReplyDeleteAn artist friend once told me that the purpose of creating art is to acquire self knowledge. This suggests to me that the purpose of viewing art is to acquire self knowledge. This sharing of purpose strikes me as a very human effort toward survival and the growth that we call evolution in science, or spiritual elevation in religion. Good on you.
ReplyDeleteAdam, I didn't know about this one! 'Good on you' is right!! Too bad our phones didn't fit in our pockets and take photos back then. All best, Merry
ReplyDelete