With a helpful nudge from "Judith," here is the monthly column as it appeared in the local paper today.
Military matters, from father to
son (12/16/15
Daily Hampshire Gazette)
A couple of months back, my younger
son, a machine-gunner for the Army National Guard, came home one evening and
announced that two security positions had opened up in Afghanistan and he had
volunteered.
My stomach lurched, but I tried to
keep a straight face. Ives is 21, a college student and has been drawn to the
military since he was little. There comes a time when a father needs to let go
of his children. But that doesn’t mean the transition is easy.
Yes, a part of me can see the
attraction of military engagement, but another part rises up in a protective
fury: This is my son we were talking about. My son!
The late Russian dictator Joseph
Stalin once said, “One death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.”
With more than 20 million Russian dead during World War II, you can see where
he was coming from.
But the idea that my son might
become another man’s statistic was beyond all words! It was beyond horror. And
it was at this point in my paternal confusion that a recollection asserted
itself.
In 1959, I attended a college that
had a mandatory ROTC (Reserve Officer Training Corps) program for freshmen. As
a freshman, I successfully petitioned to be excused based on a 19-year-old’s
conscientious objections. At 19, I was very sincere.
Yet, two years later, I signed on
the dotted line and joined the Army as much as anything because, I was “more
interested in experience than I was in virtue.” There was a draft at the time
and “everyone” participated. My father was flabbergasted: How could a “rather
intelligent young man” — as he once described me — be so stupid?
Anyway, I signed up and went. I was
a pretty good shot, but when all was said and done I ended up as a
pencil-pushing spy in Germany
— a linguist who never shot at anyone and was never shot at in return. In
addition, strangely, the unit I was assigned to in Berlin
turned out to be the single most intelligent group of people I would ever meet
in my lifetime.
My father disapproved and I did it
anyway. And now my son was on the verge of doing it and it was my turn to grind
my teeth.
But there is a difference between a
pencil-pushing spy and a cannon-fodder machine gunner. I can sympathize with a
young man’s willingness to go in harm’s way if that is the price for an inner
peace that youth seldom has a handle on. There is “brotherhood,” “patriotism,”
“service,” “courage,” “heroism,” and perhaps a whispered hope for “glory” ...
all of it a heady and reassuring social support system.
Was it ever otherwise? Old men
fashion the dreams; young men live the nightmare.
All of this and more like it
flashed through my mind as I considered Ives’ announcement. I wondered if there
was anything I could say that might be useful to the course he had chosen or
might fall victim to.
All I could think to say was this:
“If you are selected to go to Afghanistan,
I think the first thing you want to do is learn at least 100 words of the
native language spoken in your assigned country. It may not be much, but it
could save your life or the lives of your buddies or the lives of the people
whose land you occupy.”
My son looked supremely
unimpressed. Machine guns don’t need words. Bullets have their own language.
“Peacenik” rhetoric changed nothing. Why make things any harder than they
needed to be?
But what good soldier is not trained
to know his enemy? How could you know your enemy without some facility in the
language? Does esprit de corps mean a willful ignorance and mindless
flag-waving? Wouldn’t you like to think that women and children (the ones
referred to blithely as “collateral damage”) might somehow be absolved and made
safe?
One hundred words. In that
desperate split second before the trigger gets pulled, one hundred words might
make all the difference. True, it might make no difference at all: Sometimes
cruelty is the only recourse. But in the instances where words can suffice,
aren’t they preferable to the blood and loss, however gaily the banner waves?
Ives was not selected to go to Afghanistan.
But given the events in the Middle East and given a
hobbled political arena, I imagine he will get his chance. “Terrorism” is chic.
As always, the old men wear
lapel-pin flags as if they were patriots.
As always, young men go to war.
And, as always, like deer on a
highway, fathers stand transfixed in the statistical headlights.
Adam Fisher lives in Northampton.
His column appears on the third Wednesday of the month. He can be reached at
genkakukigen@aol.com.
Maybe we could get drunk and pick a fight with some shrubbery.
ReplyDelete